Public Health’s Moonshot (Part 2)
In the first post of this series, I briefly described healthcare system expenditures, as a percent of GDP, for the U.S. and a number of OECD member countries. When coupled with population health outcomes data, the amount spent per person on healthcare in the U.S. seems excessive and arguably wasteful. Individual health behaviors, genetics and a broad range of social and environmental factors account for 90% of an individual’s risk for premature death. Addressing the factors outside the healthcare system, through a reallocation of spending into social services such as employment programs and supportive housing, may play a key role in improving population health outcomes.
Social determinants of health are “the structural determinants and conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age”. As such, a contextual understanding of communities and their history is critical to tackling deep-seated social issues. Below, I focus on the community of Durham, North Carolina for place-based contextual understanding.
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) is the nation’s largest philanthropic organization dedicated to improve health. RWJF’s focus, once solely on innovation in the healthcare system, has evolved to address the social and environmental factors as well in “building a culture of health.” Shifting the way society viewed health — from the absence of illness — was an integral part in this movement. It emphasized health as a resource for living fulfilling lives and collectively contributing to a competitive and thriving nation. It developed and strengthened relationships with key stakeholders and facilitated cross-sector collaboration. And it’s engaging leaders in communities.
In 2013, RWJF named six communities with its “Culture of Health Prize.” Distinct from its traditional grantmaking program, this prize awards $25,000 to communities for the work and successes they have already achieved. By shining a spotlight on a selected group of communities each year, RWJF is able to share lessons and first-hand knowledge with community leaders nationwide. Durham, North Carolina, was one of six communities selected for the Culture of Health Prize in 2014 for the work the Partnership for a Healthy Durham has done since 2004. The Partnership is just one example of community-engaged efforts to improve the lives of Durham residents. A few additional innovative models will be introduced in subsequent posts to illustrate social impact at the local level and offer ideas to accelerate their collective impact.
Approximately 250 miles southwest of our Nation’s capital, Durham is situated at the northernmost point of North Carolina’s Research Triangle, with Raleigh and Chapel Hill to its east and west, respectively. In its former life, the city was well-known for tobacco and textile production, but fast forward to 2017 and the “City of Medicine” is in a constant state of transformation. Durham was recently anointed as a destination for foodies, “The South’s Tastiest Town,” and boasts a vibrant and diverse culinary and social scene. A major factor in its Renaissance was a collective effort to attract entrepreneurs and catalyze innovation. Community and business leaders invested a significant amount of resources to revitalize downtown and its efforts appear to be paying off. Once described a “nascent startup scene” by Madrigal in the Atlantic, now exudes self-confidence with two Durham-based startups collecting back-to-back wins in 2014 and 2015 at Google Demo Day in Silicon Valley. The startup community has also made waves nationwide for its efforts to empower and nurture diversity; its epicenter, American Underground, a Google Tech Hub, houses 48.2% minority- or female-led companies thanks to initiatives like Code 2040 — a nonprofit organization that creates pathways to the technology industry for underrepresented minorities — and strong partnerships within the Research Triangle.
In the early 20th century, Durham had the most African American millionaires per capita than any other city in the U.S. Their success in finance and insurance was evident with a section of downtown named “Black Wall Street” (Forbes) and the city was also known as the “Capital of the Black Middle Class”. The Hayti District, an independent black community founded shortly after the Civil War, became a self-sufficient community and housed residents of all social class along with a variety of businesses, schools, library, hotel and a hospital. African Americans owned and operated over 200 businesses within the boundaries of the District. It flourished for decades through the 1940s until an urban renewal project in the 1950s tore through more than 200 acres in the heart of Hayti, displacing residents and businesses alike. The project was intended to ease commuting for suburban residents by realigning streets and construction of “the Durham Freeway”, NC-147.
Historically, urban regeneration or renewal served as a method for social reform in England to address substandard and unsanitary living conditions in rapidly growing industrialized cities. In the U.S., it came in the form of federal policies used to “reshape” American cities. The Housing Acts of 1949 and 1954 disbursed federal funding for cities to “acquire” areas identified as “slums” and were given to private developers to construct new housing. Additionally, the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1956 allocated 90% of federal funding to states to construct new highways that connected to the larger Interstate System. Large urban cities including New York, Chicago, Pittsburgh and Boston undertook urban renewal projects like Durham in the 1950s. While urban renewal projects generated economic development and improved quality of life in those cities, the destruction of neighborhoods left former residents in dire situations.
A slow decline in manufacturing of textile and tobacco in Durham in the 1950s resulted in rising unemployment among working-class black residents due to segregation and discrimination. Coupled with urban renewal in the 1950s and 1960s and Civil Rights movements, the divide between whites and blacks grew. Sarah Willets of Indy Week describes an initial divide between affluent landowners and its workers even when the city was incorporated in 1869. An initial divide in opportunity which persists to this day.
“While some parts of Durham have single-digit and even less-than-1-percent poverty rates, in other neighborhoods, half the residents struggle to make ends meet.” — Sarah Willets, Indy Week
“We’ve always been taught the story of America is one of upward mobility. Durham very much embodies that. But some of the darker sides of the American story are here too.” — Justin Cook, Photographer, Slate Magazine
Photographer Justin Cook’s series, “Made in Durham” and various other pieces in the Indy illustrate what Willets captures in her story on Mayor Bell’s lasting dichotomous legacy — a thriving upward mobility amongst young professionals contrasted with historically African American neighborhoods that struggle with staggering rates of poverty and violence.
Alison Templeton, a research assistant at the UNC Center on Poverty, Work and Opportunity, released an update on urban poverty in Durham using current Census data in 2013. Templeton identified census tracts as “distressed” based on its performance compared to the state’s average on the following: per capita income, unemployment and poverty rates. 22% distressed census tracts in Durham County were identified in the report, which rose from 15% back in 2000. Other poverty-related statistics in Durham’s distressed tracts:
Child poverty 55.2%
Elderly poverty 25.6%
HS graduation 72.6%
Families led by Single Mothers 66.5%
Poverty and the consequences of sustained poverty for individuals and communities significantly impact population health outcomes. Understanding historical context is a crucial first step in adequately addressing deep-seated social issues.
This post was originally posted on the Switch Health blog by Ramon Llamas
Part 1 of the 3 part series can be found here.